Snell & Co. and RREEF Purchase Cupertino Office Building From Symantec

Notable Deals 1 Comment »

Snell & Co. has acquired a +/- 90,000 square feet office building from Symantec, The three-story building is located at the corner of Torre Avenue and Rodrigues Ave in Cupertino. The building was delivered vacant.

We heard about this sale a few months ago when Snell & Co. tied the site up and was on the hunt for the financing and/or joint-venture partner it needed to conclude the deal. The word is that the sales price was right around $330 per square foot or $30M.

The building is a Class B+ asset, and can be fairly easily demised down into chunks of roughly 15K SF. Market rents for this quality space are in the $2.75 NNN range, with an allowance of $10-15 psf.  The new owners plan on upgrading the common areas, lobby, exterior, and elevator cabs. This building should clean up nicely, but the ceiling heights are a little low (8′-8′5″) to be considered quality Class A space and appeal to everyone. Cupertino is a historically strong market and currently benefits from single digit vacancy rates due to Apple’s voracious appetite for space.

Update: Another broker has emailed us and indicated that asking rents are $3.10 NNN at this project, and that they will demise the spaces down to about 5,000 SF. $3.10 is a fairly strong number for this asset, we’ll see if they can achieve that.

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Second Quarter Silicon Valley Office Space Leasing Activity

Market Data, Notable Deals No Comments »

The list below represents the top lease transactions which occurred in Silicon Valley during the second quarter of 2008.

Tenant Address Submarket Sq. Feet Class
Blue Coat Systems 410-420 N Mary Avenue Sunnyvale        233,174 B
EMC Corporation 2350 W El Camino Real Mountain View        105,143 A
Symbol Technologies 6480 Via Del Oro San Jose        102,000 A
Philips Electronics 3860 N First St San Jose        101,582 B
Gunderson Dettmer 1200 Seaport Blvd Redwood City           98,022 A
Motorola 809 11th Avenue Sunnyvale           91,306 A
Apple 19925 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino           74,260 B
Lab 126 20450 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino           69,534 A
Akamai 3125 Clearview Way San Mateo           64,954 B
Goodwin Procter, LP 135 Commonwealth Dr Menlo Park           58,800 A
Efficient Frontier, Inc. 809 11th Avenue Sunnyvale           43,320 A
Silver Peak Systems 4500 Great America Pkwy Santa Clara           39,500 A
Emulex 2650 N 1st Street San Jose           31,388 B
King and Spalding 333 Twin Dolphin Dr Redwood City           27,773 A
Ropes & Gray 1900 University Ave East Palo Alto           24,050 A
Packet Design Management 2455 Augustine Drive Santa Clara           23,008 B
SiBeam 555 Mathilda Avenue Sunnyvale           22,810 B
TPL 20450 Stevens Creek Blvd Cupertino           21,638 A
On Live 181 Lytton Avenue Palo Alto           21,267 A
Map Pharmaceuticals 2400 Bayshore Parkway Mountain View           21,000 B
Aricent 700 Hansen Way Palo Alto           19,396 B
Arcadia Homes 900 E Hamilton Ave Campbell           16,348 A
Dolby Labs 3975 Freedom Circle Santa Clara           15,559 A
MobilyGen 2900 Lakeside Drive Santa Clara           13,644 B
EORM 4 N Second Street San Jose           13,151 B
Mintz Levin 3000 El Camino Real Palo Alto           12,800 A
GCA Law Partners 1881 Landings Dr Mountain View           12,183 B
Total    1,377,610  

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

A Guide to Office Building Classifications; Class A, Class B, Class C

Leasing Tips, Tools 1 Comment »

When considering office space, tenants will find that office buildings are generally classified as being either a Class A, Class B, or a Class C building. The difference between each of these classifications varies by market and class B and C buildings are generally classified relative to Class A buildings. Building classifications are used to differentiate buildings and help the reporting of market data in a manner that differentiates between building types. That said, there is no definitive formula for classifying a building, but in the general characteristics of each are as follows:

  • Class A. These buildings represent the highest quality buildings in their market. They are generally the best looking buildings with the best construction, and possess high quality building infrastructure. Class A buildings also are well-located, have good access, and are professionally managed. As a result of this, they attract the highest quality tenants and also command the highest rents.
  • Class B. This is the next notch down. Class B buildings are generally a little older, but still have good quality management and tenants. Often times, value-added investors target these buildings as investments since well-located Class B buildings can be returned to their Class A glory through renovation such as facade and common area improvements. Class B buildings should generally not be functionally obsolete and should be well maintained.
  • Class C. The lowest classification of office building and space is Class C. These are older buildings (usually more than 20), and are located in less desirable areas and are in need of extensive renovation. Architecturally, these buildings are the least desirable and building infrastructure and technology is out-dated. As a result, Class C buildings have the lowest rental rates, take the longest time to lease, and are often targeted as re-development opportunities.

The above is just a general guideline of building classifications. No formal international standard exists for classifying a building, but one of the most important things to consider about building classifications is that buildings should be viewed in context and relative to other buildings within the sub-market; a Class A building in one market may not be a Class A building in another.

There is no international standard for classifying office buildings. In fact, BOMA is generally against the publication of a classification rating for individual properties. Were there a more scientific method for classifying buildings though, some of the building characteristics which could be used to compare and rank buildings would be as follows:

  • HVAC Capacity
  • Elevator quantity and speed
  • Backup Power
  • Security and life safety infrastructure
  • Ceiling heights
  • Floor load capacity
  • Location
  • Access (freeway, public transportation)
  • Parking
  • Construction, Common Area Improvements
  • Nearby and/or on-site amenities (dry cleaning, restaurants, ATM, etc.)

Rate this post: 1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Tags: , , , , , ,

© Copyright 2008 Commercial Real Estate Blog. All Rights Reserved
Entries RSS Comments RSS Login Log in

WP Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio